the same
referred to in yox des patch, Hort69 of the
17th inty, 19 and I am communicating with
other Departments to see if it is possible
I the clarin
In
for any settlement to be effected. In the
also
(Catyous o
same despatch you referred to a claim against
(£58,086)
•384/*
the Government of Singapore for $929,384/which
Way
is being dealt with direct with that
Government, and I assume that no action on
my part is required on this claim.
tun
3 I have now to refer to the category of
Category B
the claims
relating to stores which were in
process of manufacture but were not actually shipped
or delivered to go down. The amount of
(Macand J orders placed
M
live
behelf of the Easting from Supply Command in Sirena
such claims/referred to in your despatch
No.163 of 27th June 1947 was $7,748,986
(£484,312). In my despatch No.400 of the
24th December 1947, paragraph 4, I suggested
that you should refuse to meet all claims
within this category. I added that there
would be no objection to the claimants
lodging claims for loss or damage, to the
Hong Kong War Damage Claims Commission.
You recommended however, in your despatch
that there should be
No.
of
no War Damage Compensation Scheme in Hong Kong,
a recommendation which I accepted in my
12
سم
despatch No.
of
In the circumstances
amm
agree
I
fear that I
unable to *
that any part of the loss should fall
on H.M.G. and in view of your recommendation
as regards War Damage Compensation Scheme
there appears to be no alternative but for
2
C
the/
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.